Persons of Note in the Cabin 28 Murders wrote:Seabolt, James Sr.: Went wood cutting 4/12/81 before crime discovered, heard nothing night before, see Vicky Rhodes, found # 6451 on window sill where John used to sleep, saw wht/grn Blazer at Krois'
As I don't believe the number 6451 has anything to do with Phillip (Phil specifically said it was a license plate number and that he etched it on the water heater), I'm dropping him from the discussion and giving the topic a clean thread. Evidently, it was James Seabolt Sr who found the number on the window sill. Of course, it's a cop writing this down, so the translation is from English to Pig Latin, so take the result with a cup of salt. For instance, "where Johnny slept" means "anywhere downstairs", just as cops routinely translated 'downstairs' into "under the cabin". Thus, a window sill can be a window in a wall or a window in a door. The cops involved were clearly incapable of differentiating such broad subtleties in their reports, so we have to constantly dummy down our assumptions to keep pace.
6451 was the number found. I don't think it was a partial plate number, for many reasons including the lack of letters, lack of sufficient number of digits, and that even someone unsure of a full plate number would make a guess at what was missing... "I can't remember if it was AFW 6451 or AEM 6451, so I'll just write down what I'm certain of..." Bullshit. Four digits, to me, means it could be the suffix of a phone number. In Keddie in 81, for instance, I believe the prefix was 281 (I think MK verified this recently, as well)-- and, for the most part, it still is. So was it 281-6451? That number is currently unlisted, so please don't bother calling--- it's been 30 years and I highly doubt the number is still assigned to the same party! We need to find who 281-6451 was assigned to in 1981, not 2012.
Back to "found # 6451 on window sill where John used to sleep". Something has bothered me since I got these photos so long ago: there was blue spray-paint on the sill of the window next to the entry door into the basement, and red spray-paint on the window in the entry door itself. It always looked very fresh and out of place to me, but I couldn't conceive of a reason for LE- or anyone- to put paint there after the crimes. Here's a photo taken by LE at the time:
Since Stoy's report on the by-the-numbers perfect collection of evidence and perfect sealing of the crime scene is pure pig perjury, we can easily assume the cops were responsible for the paint. But why? They used a tape-backed emblem/warning notice to seal doors and windows, not paint, and you can't open a window in a door, and the window sill with paint on it was the portion of that remains in place (not the sliding window), so what possible use could paint serve?
And, to prove the paint came AFTER the crimes, I have this screen grab of the same area, taken by Sac Channel 13 when they covered the crime back in 81. Although the stairs are in the way, and the door is open (not sealed, mind you), you can see there is NO PAINT on the window. YET. You can see this footage for yourself at roughly 12:43 minutes into in Part 1:
I find no valid excuse for the use of paint by LE, particularly seeing as Stoy didn't mention it in his falsehood-filled account of the investigation. What possible reason could LE have for using paint and not mentioning it? Were they destroying evidence? If so, what were they hiding?