I've been adding up all the tape mentioned in autopsy reports, and here's what I've found (all estimates are based on minimum lengths so as not to overshoot the very minimum amount of tape used in the crime):
- Sue-
The report lists at least three loops, and up to five loops around her wrists, plus more around the wrist where the taping began. Wraps around her ankles would be a minimum of 10 inches per loop, and the report lists "at least five" loops, plus more around the ankle where the taping began.
Also, the autopsy report lists multiple strips of tape used in the gag, four of which were 'up to an estimated 8 inches in length'. As only four are mentioned at near that length, I will only list 32" worth of tape, ignoring the other strips not clearly detailed.
8x3= 24"
8x5= 40"
5x10= 50"
4x8"- 32"
Total: Sue had a minimum of 146" of tape used to restrain her (including the extra used to start the loops)
.
- Johnny-
He had no tape on his legs.
.
- Dana-
Dana was wearing large hiking boots, and the tape was wrapped fully around one boot, and then around his other boot and leg. That's at least 60" of tape on his boots alone for one good wrap using that method.
.
- Total
Back then, and even now, the common length for rolls of household medical tape was 5 yards, or fifteen feet. 180 inches. That means more than one standard roll of tape was already used inside of cabin 28, not counting the fact I underestimated and did not take into account the tape used on Sue's mouth as part of the gag. It'salso likely Tina was bound with tape, but there's no way to determine that. The amount of wide tape vs narrow tape used would prove whether at least 3 (brand new) rolls of tape were in use. The only time the wider tape is mentioned is on Dana, the strongest of the victims. If all the tape used on Sue and Johnny is the narrow width, that means the very minimal amount of narrow tape used on Sue and Johnny is 178 inches, or 98.88888% of a brand-new 5 yard roll. If I underestimated by only three inches (and the other strips on Sue's gag would account for far more than 3"), that's definitely at least two full rolls of narrow tape used, and one roll of wide tape in use. Three rolls of medical tape and no premed?
.
- Summation:
Next is the fact more tape was used to bind them than can be easily explained away. Unless Sue had multiple rolls of medical tape handy (since taping and gagging was done before much, if any, blood had been spilled), it was brought to the cabin. In rural areas, you're not very useful unless you carry a pocketknife, so claims of pocket knives mean nothing towards premeditation in this case. But who carries around medical tape? THAT would definitely match the definition of premeditation of a greater crime.
Since this initial post, it has been determined from LE records that two separate widths of medical tape were used to bind the victims found in Cabin 28, which alone proves multiple rolls were used in the crime, and further proves premeditation was likely as no survivor from Cabin 28 recalls any medical tape in the house, much less multiple rolls, and Marilyn stated on April 13 there should be several rolls of med tape in cabin 26.
Last, but not least, is Weapon #4. What was it? Can it be accounted for as an object missing from 28, like a piece of broken furniture? The crime scene photos I've seen show absolutely no broken furniture, so are these simply more melodramatic claims from a loopy officer, or are there photos and reports supporting the 'smashed furniture' claims? Weapon #4 was long, solid, and consistently, evenly shaped where the damage was done on Dana. All the other "tools" used by the killers were found in the front room, so where is #4? Was it taken outside the cabin with Tina and later discarded? Is it a piece of evidence intentionally held out of public scrutiny by LE?
There was a degree of intent that something unpleasant was going to happen in Cabin 28 that night. The perps did not go there with roses and candy in mind. The main questions from this post / thread are:
- Was there enough intent of a crime to constitute premeditation, and to what end?
Was the tape brought with them?
Was weapon #4 brought with them?
Discussion of Weapon 4 found here:
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=377&p=5340
This is not meant to be a post that ends up in a free-for-all of pointless speculation. It is solely meant to lay out evidence that there was clearly a degree of intent or premeditation by the perps, and any solid answers to the above questions can help explain the degree of premed and, perhaps, what ends the perps had in mind when approaching cabin 28 that night.
.